Principles of Marketing (activebook 2.0 )
 
 
   
   
 

  

Competitive Strategies

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Having identified and evaluated its major competitors, the company now must design broad competitive marketing strategies by which it can gain competitive advantage by offering superior customer value. But what broad marketing strategies might the company use? Which ones are best for a particular company, or for the company's different divisions and products?
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Approaches to Marketing Strategy

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
No one strategy is best for all companies. Each company must determine what makes the most sense given its position in the industry and its objectives, opportunities, and resources. Even within a company, different strategies may be required for different businesses or products. Johnson & Johnson uses one marketing strategy for its leading brands in stable consumer markets and a different marketing strategy for its new high-tech health care businesses and products.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Companies also differ in how they approach the strategy-planning process. Many large firms develop formal competitive marketing strategies and implement them religiously. However, other companies develop strategy in a less formal and orderly fashion. A recent book, Radical Marketing, praises companies such as Harley-Davidson, Virgin Atlantic Airways, and Boston Beer for succeeding by breaking many of the "rules" of marketing strategy.9 Such companies don't operate large marketing departments, conduct expensive marketing research, spell out formal and elaborate competitive strategies, and spend huge sums on advertising and selling. Instead, they sketch out strategies on the fly, stretch their limited resources, live close to their customers, and create more-satisfying solutions to customer needs. They form buyer's clubs, use buzz marketing, and focus on delivering high product quality and winning long-term customer loyalty. It seems that not all marketing must follow in the footsteps of marketing giants such as IBM and Procter & Gamble.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
In fact, approaches to marketing strategy and practice often pass through three stages: entrepreneurial marketing, formulated marketing, and intrepreneurial marketing.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Entrepreneurial marketing: Most companies are started by individuals who live by their wits. They visualize an opportunity, construct flexible strategies on the backs of envelopes, and knock on every door to gain attention. Jim Koch, founder of Boston Beer Company, whose Samuel Adams beer has become a top-selling microbrewery beer, started out in 1984 carrying bottles of Samuel Adams from bar to bar to persuade bartenders to carry it. He would coax them into adding Samuel Adams beer to their menus. For 10 years, he couldn't afford advertising; he sold his beer through direct selling and grassroots public relations. Today, however, his business pulls in nearly $200 million, making it the leader over more than 1000 competitors in the microbrewery market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Formulated marketing: As small companies achieve success, they inevitably move toward more-formulated marketing. They develop formal marketing strategies and adhere to them closely. Boston Beer now employs more than 175 salespeople and has a marketing department that carries out market research and plans strategy. Although Boston Beer is far less formal and sophisticated in its strategy than archcompetitor Anheuser-Busch, it has adopted some of the tools used in professionally run marketing companies.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Intrepreneurial marketing. Many large and mature companies get stuck in formulated marketing. They pore over the latest Nielsen numbers, scan market research reports, and try to fine-tune their competitive strategies and programs. These companies sometimes lose the marketing creativity and passion that they had at the start. They now need to reestablish within their companies the entrepreneurial spirit and actions that made them successful in the first place. They need to encourage more initiative and "intrepreneurship" at the local level. They need to refresh their marketing strategies and try new approaches. Their brand and product managers need to get out of the office, start living with their customers, and visualize new and creative ways to add value to their customers' lives.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The bottom line is that there are many approaches to developing effective competitive marketing strategy. There will be a constant tension between the formulated side of marketing and the creative side. It is easier to learn the formulated side of marketing, which has occupied most of our attention in this book. But we have also seen how marketing creativity and passion in the strategies of many of the company's we've studied—whether small or large, new or mature—have helped to build and maintain success in the marketplace. With this in mind, we now look at broad competitive marketing strategies companies can use.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Basic Competitive Strategies

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
More than two decades ago, Michael Porter suggested four basic competitive positioning strategies that companies can follow—three winning strategies and one losing one.10 The three winning strategies include:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Overall cost leadership: Here the company works hard to achieve the lowest production and distribution costs. Low costs let it price lower than its competitors and win a large market share. Texas Instruments, Dell Computer, and Wal-Mart are leading practitioners of this strategy.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Differentiation: Here the company concentrates on creating a highly differentiated product line and marketing program so that it comes across as the class leader in the industry. Most customers would prefer to own this brand if its price is not too high. IBM and Caterpillar follow this strategy in information technology products and services and heavy construction equipment, respectively.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Focus: Here the company focuses its effort on serving a few market segments well rather than going after the whole market. For example, Ritz-Carlton focuses on the top 5 percent of corporate and leisure travelers. Glassmaker AFG Industries focuses on users of tempered and colored glass. It makes 70 percent of the glass for microwave oven doors and 75 percent of the glass for shower doors and patio tabletops. Similarly, Hohner owns a stunning 85 percent of the harmonica market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Hohner
Focus: Small but profitable Hohner owns a stunning 85 percent of the harmonica market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Companies that pursue a clear strategy—one of the above—will likely perform well. The firm that carries out that strategy best will make the most profits. But firms that do not pursue a clear strategy—middle-of-the-roaders—do the worst. Sears, Holiday Inn, and Kmart encountered difficult times because they did not stand out as the lowest in cost, highest in perceived value, or best in serving some market segment. Middle-of-the-roaders try to be good on all strategic counts, but end up being not very good at anything.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
More recently, two marketing consultants, Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema, offered a new classification of competitive marketing strategies.11 They suggest that companies gain leadership positions by delivering superior value to their customers. Companies can pursue any of three strategies—called value disciplines—for delivering superior customer value. These are:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Operational excellence: The company provides superior value by leading its industry in price and convenience. It works to reduce costs and to create a lean and efficient value delivery system. It serves customers who want reliable, good-quality products or services, but who want them cheaply and easily. Examples include Wal-Mart, Southwest Airlines, and Dell Computer.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Customer intimacy: The company provides superior value by precisely segmenting its markets and tailoring its products or services to match exactly the needs of targeted customers. It specializes in satisfying unique customer needs through a close relationship with and intimate knowledge of the customer. It builds detailed customer databases for segmenting and targeting, and empowers its marketing people to respond quickly to customer needs. Customer-intimate companies serve customers who are willing to pay a premium to get precisely what they want. They will do almost anything to build long-term customer loyalty and to capture customer lifetime value. Examples include Nordstrom, Sony, Lexus, American Express, and British Airways.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Product leadership: The company provides superior value by offering a continuous stream of leading-edge products or services. It aims to make its own and competing products obsolete. Product leaders are open to new ideas, relentlessly pursue new solutions, and work to get new products to market quickly. They serve customers who want state-of-the-art products and services, regardless of the costs in terms of price or inconvenience. Examples include Intel, Motorola, and Microsoft.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Some companies successfully pursue more than one value discipline at the same time. For example, FedEx excels at both operational excellence and customer intimacy. However, such companies are rare—few firms can be the best at more than one of these disciplines. By trying to be good at all of the value disciplines, a company usually ends up being best at none.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Figure 18.3
 Figure 18.3 Hypothetical market structure 
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Treacy and Wiersema have found that leading companies focus on and excel at a single value discipline, while meeting industry standards on the other two. Such companies design their entire value delivery network to single-mindedly support the chosen discipline. For example, Wal-Mart knows that customer intimacy and product leadership are important. Compared with other discounters, such as Kmart, it offers very good customer service and an excellent product assortment. Still, it offers less customer service and less product depth than do Nordstrom, Eddie Bauer, or The Sharper Image, which pursue customer intimacy. Instead, Wal-Mart focuses obsessively on operational excellence—on reducing costs and streamlining its order-to-delivery process in order to make it convenient for customers to buy just the right products at the lowest prices.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Classifying competitive strategies as value disciplines is appealing. It defines marketing strategy in terms of the single-minded pursuit of delivering superior value to customers. Each value discipline defines a specific way to build lasting customer relationships.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Competitive Positions

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Firms competing in a given target market, at any point in time, differ in their objectives and resources. Some firms are large, others small. Some have many resources, others are strapped for funds. Some are old and established, others new and fresh. Some strive for rapid market share growth, others for long-term profits. And the firms occupy different competitive positions in the target market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
We now examine competitive strategies based on the roles firms play in the target market—leader, challenger, follower, or nicher. Suppose that an industry contains the firms shown in Figure 18.3. Forty percent of the market is in the hands of the market leader, the firm with the largest market share. Another 30 percent is in the hands of market challengers, runner-up firms that are fighting hard to increase their market share. Another 20 percent is in the hands of market followers, other runner-up firms that want to hold their share without rocking the boat. The remaining 10 percent is in the hands of market nichers, firms that serve small segments not being pursued by other firms.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Table 18.1 shows specific marketing strategies that are available to market leaders, challengers, followers, and nichers.12 Remember, however, that these classifications often do not apply to a whole company, but only to its position in a specific industry. Large companies such as IBM, Microsoft, Procter & Gamble, or Disney might be leaders in some markets and nichers in others. For example, Procter & Gamble leads in many segments, such as dishwashing and laundry detergents, disposable diapers, and shampoo. But it challenges Lever in the hand soaps and Kimberly-Clark in facial tissues. Such companies often use different strategies for different business units or products, depending on the competitive situations of each.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
 Table 18.1 Strategies for Market Leaders, Challengers, Followers, and Nichers 
Market Leader
Strategies
Market Challenger
Strategies
Market Follower
Strategies
Market Nicher
Strategies

Expand total market Full frontal attack Folloow closely By customer, market,
Prottect market share Indirect attack Follow at a distance quality–price, service
Expand market share Multiple niching
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Market Leader Strategies

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Most industries contain an acknowledged market leader. The leader has the largest market share and usually leads the other firms in price changes, new-product introductions, distribution coverage, and promotion spending. The leader may or may not be admired or respected, but other firms concede its dominance. Competitors focus on the leader as a company to challenge, imitate, or avoid. Some of the best-known market leaders are Wal-Mart (retailing), General Motors (autos), IBM (computers and information technology services), Caterpillar (earth-moving equipment), Coca-Cola (soft drinks), McDonald's (fast food), Nike (athletic footwear), and Gillette (razors and blades).
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
A leader's life is not easy. It must maintain a constant watch. Other firms keep challenging its strengths or trying to take advantage of its weaknesses. The market leader can easily miss a turn in the market and plunge into second or third place. A product innovation may come along and hurt the leader (as when Nokia's and Ericsson's digital phones took the lead from Motorola's analog models). The leader might grow arrogant or complacent and misjudge the competition (as when Sears lost its lead to Wal-Mart). Or the leader might look old-fashioned against new and peppier rivals (as when Levi's lost serious ground to more current or stylish brands like Gap, Tommy Hilfiger, DKNY, or Guess).
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
To remain number one, leading firms can take any of three actions. First, they can find ways to expand total demand. Second, they can protect their current market share through good defensive and offensive actions. Third, they can try to expand their market share further, even if market size remains constant.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Expanding the Total Demand

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The leading firm normally gains the most when the total market expands. If Americans take more pictures, Kodak stands to gain the most because it sells more than 80 percent of this country's film. If Kodak can convince more Americans to take pictures, or to take pictures on more occasions, or to take more pictures on each occasion, it will benefit greatly.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Market leaders can expand the market by developing new users, new uses, and more usage of its products. They usually can find new users in many places. For example, Revlon might find new perfume users in its current markets by convincing women who do not use perfume to try it. It might find users in new demographic segments, such as by producing fragrances for men. Or it might expand into new geographic segments, perhaps by selling its fragrances in other countries.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Marketers can expand markets by discovering and promoting new uses for the product. For example, Intel invests heavily to develop new PC, networking, and telecommunications applications, which in turn increases the demand for microprocessors. It knows that it will get a large share of the new microprocessor business. Another example of new-use expansion is Arm & Hammer baking soda, whose sales had flattened after 125 years. Then the company discovered that consumers were using baking soda as a refrigerator deodorizer. It launched a heavy advertising and publicity campaign focusing on this use and persuaded consumers in half of America's homes to place an open box of baking soda in their refrigerators and to replace it every few months. Today, its Web site (www.armandhammer.com) regularly features new uses, from removing residue left behind by hair-styling products and sweetening garbage disposals, laundry hampers, refrigerators, and trash cans to creating a home spa in your bathroom. Similarly, The WD-40 Company collected user suggestions and sponsored contests to uncover new uses for its all-purpose lubricant, making WD-40 one of the truly essential survival items in most American homes.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Finally, market leaders can encourage more usage by convincing people to use the product more often or to use more per occasion. For example, Campbell urges people to eat soup more often by running ads containing new recipes. It also offers a toll-free hot line (1-888-MM-MM-GOOD), staffed by live "recipe representatives" who offer recipes to last-minute cooks at a loss for meal ideas. And the Campbell's Kitchen section of the company's Web site (www.cambellsoup.com) lets visitors search for or exchange recipes, set up their own personal recipe box, and even sign up for a daily or weekly Meal Mail program.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Protecting Market Share

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
While trying to expand total market size, the leading firm also must protect its current business against competitors' attacks. Coca-Cola must also constantly guard against Pepsi; Gillette against Bic; Wal-Mart against Target; and McDonald's against Wendy's.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
What can the market leader do to protect its position? First, it must prevent or fix weaknesses that provide opportunities for competitors. It must always fulfill its value promise. Its prices must remain consistent with the value that customers see in the brand. It must work tirelessly to keep strong relationships with valued customers. The leader should "plug holes" so that competitors do not jump in. But the best defense is a good offense, and the best response is continuous innovation. The leader refuses to be content with the way things are and leads the industry in new products, customer services, distribution effectiveness, and cost cutting. It keeps increasing its competitive effectiveness and value to customers.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
For example, International Game Technology (IGT) manufactures slot machines and video poker machines for casinos around the world. It has achieved the daunting 75 percent market share in its mature market. Unlike the people who use its products, IGT doesn't rely on luck. Instead, it has formed partnerships with both casino operators and competitive gaming manufacturers to develop innovative new equipment to replace the old. IGT spends aggressively on R&D, allocating $31 million annually to create new games. "We know months, years, in advance what our customers want," says Robert Shay, a sales director for IGT. In this way, IGT takes the offensive, sets the pace, and exploits competitors' weaknesses.13
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
EXPANDING MARKET SHARE    Market leaders also can grow by increasing their market shares further. In many markets, small market share increases mean very large sales increases. For example, in the coffee market, a 1 percent increase in market share is worth $48 million; in soft drinks, $500 million!
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Studies have shown that, on average, profitability rises with increasing market share. Because of these findings, many companies have sought expanded market shares to improve profitability. General Electric, for example, declared that it wants to be at least number one or two in each of its markets or else get out. GE shed its computer, air-conditioning, small-appliances, and television businesses because it could not achieve top-dog position in these industries.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
However, some studies have found that many industries contain one or a few highly profitable large firms, several profitable and more focused firms, and a large number of medium-sized firms with poorer profit performance. It appears that profitability increases as a business gains share relative to competitors in its served market. For example, Lexus holds only a small share of the total car market, but it earns high profit because it is a high-share company in its luxury-performance car segment. And it has achieved this high share in its served market because it does other things right, such as producing high quality, giving good service, and building close customer relationships.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Companies must not think, however, that gaining increased market share will improve profitability automatically. Much depends on their strategy for gaining increased share. There are many high-share companies with low profitability and many low-share companies with high profitability. The cost of buying higher market share may far exceed the returns. Higher shares tend to produce higher profits only when unit costs fall with increased market share, or when the company offers a superior-quality product and charges a premium price that more than covers the cost of offering higher quality.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Market Challenger Strategies

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Firms that are second, third, or lower in an industry are sometimes quite large, such as Colgate, Ford, Target, Avis, and Pepsi. These runner-up firms can adopt one of two competitive strategies: They can challenge the leader and other competitors in an aggressive bid for more market share (market challengers). Or they can play along with competitors and not rock the boat (market followers).
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
A market challenger must first define which competitors to challenge and its strategic objective. The challenger can attack the market leader. This is a high-risk but potentially high-gain strategy that makes good sense if the leader is not serving the market well. To succeed with such an attack, a company must have some sustainable competitive advantage over the leader. This might be a cost advantage leading to lower prices or the ability to provide better value at a premium price. If the company goes after the market leader, its objective may be to wrest a certain market share. Bic knows that it can't topple Gillette in the razor market—it simply wants a larger share. Or the challenger's goal might be to take over market leadership. Wal-Mart began as a nicher in small towns in the Southwest, grew rapidly to challenge market leader Sears, and finally assumed market leadership, all within a span of less than 25 years.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Alternatively, the challenger can avoid the leader and instead challenge firms its own size, or smaller local and regional firms. These smaller firms may be underfinanced and not serving their customers well. Several of the major beer companies grew to their present size not by challenging large competitors, but by gobbling up small local or regional competitors. If the company goes after a small local company, its objective may be to put that company out of business. The important point remains: The challenger must choose its opponents carefully and have a clearly defined and attainable objective.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
How can the market challenger best attack the chosen competitor and achieve its strategic objectives? It may launch a full frontal attack, matching the competitor's product, advertising, price, and distribution efforts. It attacks the competitor's strengths rather than its weaknesses. The outcome depends on who has the greater strength and endurance. If the market challenger has fewer resources than the competitor, a frontal attack makes little sense. For example, the runner-up razor-blade manufacturer in Brazil attacked Gillette, the market leader. The attacker was asked if it offered the consumer a better razor blade. "No," was the reply. "A lower price?" "No." "A better package?" "No." "A clever advertising campaign?" "No." "Better allowances to the trade?" "No." "Then how do you expect to take share away from Gillette?" "Sheer determination" was the reply. Needless to say, the offensive failed. Even great size and strength may not be enough to challenge a firmly entrenched, resourceful competitor successfully.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Market challengers
Market challengers: Pepsi aggressively challenges market leader Coca-Cola in the soft drink market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Rather than challenging head-on, the challenger can make an indirect attack on the competitor's weaknesses or on gaps in the competitor's market coverage. For example, Dell Computer found a foothold against giant IBM in the personal computer market by selling directly to consumers. Southwest Airlines challenged American and other large carriers by serving the overlooked short-haul, no-frills commuter segment. Such indirect challenges make good sense when the company has fewer resources than the competitor.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Market Follower Strategies

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Not all runner-up companies want to challenge the market leader. Challenges are never taken lightly by the leader. If the challenger's lure is lower prices, improved service, or additional product features, the leader can quickly match these to defuse the attack. The leader probably has more staying power in an all-out battle for customers. For example, Kmart recently launched a renewed low-price "BlueLight Special" campaign challenging Wal-Mart's everyday low prices. However, given its lower costs and greater resources, Wal-Mart had little trouble fending off Kmart's challenge, leaving Kmart worse off for the attempt. Thus, many firms prefer to follow rather than challenge the leader.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Similarly, after years of challenging Procter & Gamble unsuccessfully in the U.S. laundry detergent market, Unilever recently decided to throw in the towel and become a follower instead. P&G, which captures a 57 percent share of the market versus Unilever's 17 percent share, has outmuscled competitors on every front. For example, it spends more than $100 million a year on advertising for Tide alone, and has battered competitors with a relentless stream of new and improved products. Unilever is now cutting prices and promotion on its detergents to focus on profit rather than market share.14
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
A follower can gain many advantages. The market leader often bears the huge expenses of developing new products and markets, expanding distribution, and educating the market. By contrast, the market follower can learn from the leader's experience. It can copy or improve on the leader's products and programs, usually with much less investment. Although the follower will probably not overtake the leader, it often can be as profitable. A good example of a follower is Dial Corporation, maker of such well-known brands as Dial, Tone, and Pure&Natural hand soaps, Armour Star canned meats, Purex laundry products, and Renuzit air fresheners. Throughout the 1990s, Dial pursued a "fast follow" strategy:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Flashy it isn't. "We want to be the dullest story in America," declares Dial's CEO… . Dial doesn't spend zillions to make its offerings household names across the nation. Instead, Dial prefers to coast in the slipstream of giant rivals, such as Procter & Gamble… . Instead of spending big on research and development or marketing, Dial leaves it to others… . And Dial lets other companies educate consumers about new products. P&G, for instance, introduced concentrated powder detergents in 1990. Dial followed over a year later with its own concentrated version, Purex—priced as much as one-third lower than P&G's Tide. Despite this low profile, the company does well in its markets. For example, Dial soap is America's number one antibacterial soap, and Purex has staked out a leadership position in the value segment of the laundry detergent market. Renuzit is the nation's number two air freshener brand, and Amour Star is number two in canned meats.15

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Following is not the same as being passive or a carbon copy of the leader. For example, in recent years, follower Dial's has focused on being "first, fresh, and fast to market" with innovative new brand extensions such as Dial Complete and Renuzit Super Odor Neutralizer. A market follower must know how to hold current customers and win a fair share of new ones. It must find the right balance between following closely enough to win customers from the market leader but following at enough of a distance to avoid retaliation. Each follower tries to bring distinctive advantages to its target market—location, services, financing. The follower is often a major target of attack by challengers. Therefore, the market follower must keep its manufacturing costs low and its product quality and services high. It must also enter new markets as they open up.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Market Nicher Strategies

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Almost every industry includes firms that specialize in serving market niches. Instead of pursuing the whole market, or even large segments, these firms target subsegments. Nichers are often smaller firms with limited resources. But smaller divisions of larger firms also may pursue niching strategies. Firms with low shares of the total market can be highly profitable through smart niching. For example, you've probably never heard of McDonald's competitor Jollibee. In terms of global market share, Jollibee is a mouse among the elephants. But in its niche, the Philippines, Jollibee captures a 75 percent share of hamburger market and 53 percent of the fast-food market as a whole.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Why is niching profitable? The main reason is that the market nicher ends up knowing the target customer group so well that it meets their needs better than other firms that casually sell to this niche. As a result, the nicher can charge a substantial markup over costs because of the added value. Whereas the mass marketer achieves high volume, the nicher achieves high margins.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Nichers try to find one or more market niches that are safe and profitable. An ideal market niche is big enough to be profitable and has growth potential. It is one that the firm can serve effectively. Perhaps most importantly, the niche is of little interest to major competitors. And the firm can build the skills and customer goodwill to defend itself against a major competitor as the niche grows and becomes more attractive. Here are just a few examples of profitable nichers:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Logitech has become a $944 million global success story by focusing on human interface devices—computer mice, game controllers, keyboards, PC video cameras, and others. It makes every variation of computer mouse imaginable. Logitech turns out mice for left- and right-handed people, wireless mice, mice shaped like real mice for children, and 3-D mice that let the user appear to move behind screen objects. Breeding computer mice has been so successful that Logitech dominates the world market, with Microsoft as its runner-up. This year, Logitech had its best year ever. Revenues were up 28 percent and profits soared 66 percent.16

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

The First Commerce Bank in Charlotte, North Carolina, opened its doors in 1996 with a laser focus on serving the banking needs of small- to mid-size businesses. It offered extended business hours, Internet banking for cash management, and a courier service for daily pick-up of noncash deposits from small-business clients, most of whom have few employees and prefer to remain in the office. Early ads focused on First Commerce's small size and more personalized service, building on the insecurities that small-business owners have in dealing with large banks. One ad showed a huge tower with a headline that read, "Your loan application is in there somewhere." In just five years, First Commerce Bank grew from $1 million to $131 million in assets with three branches, no small accomplishment in a city filled with large national banks. The U.S. Small Business Administration recently named First Commerce the top community bank in North Carolina. "The big banks in Charlotte were so focused on [bigger game] that we've picked up some of their business," says CEO Wes Sturges. "Their crumbs are tasty morsels for us."17

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The key idea in niching is specialization. A market nicher can specialize along any of several market, customer, product, or marketing mix lines. For example, it can specialize in serving one type of end user, as when a law firm specializes in the criminal, civil, or business law markets. The nicher can specialize in serving a given customer-size group. Many nichers, such as First Commerce Bank, specialize in serving small customers who are neglected by the majors.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Some nichers focus on one or a few specific customers, selling their entire output to a single company, such as Wal-Mart or General Motors. Still other nichers specialize by geographic market, selling only in a certain locality, region, or area of the world. Quality–price nichers operate at the low or high end of the market. For example, Hewlett-Packard specializes in the high-quality, high-price end of the hand-calculator market. Finally, service nichers offer services not available from other firms. An example is a bank that takes loan requests over the phone and hand-delivers the money to the customer.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Niching carries some major risks. For example, the market niche may dry up, or it might grow to the point that it attracts larger competitors. That is why many companies practice multiple niching. By developing two or more niches, a company increases its chances for survival. Even some large firms prefer a multiple niche strategy to serving the total market. For example, Alberto Culver is a $2.5 billion company that has used a multiple niching strategy to grow profitably without incurring the wrath of the market leader. CEO Howard Bernick explains the Alberto Culver philosophy this way: "We know who we are and, perhaps more importantly, we know who we are not. We know that if we try to out-Procter Procter, we will fall flat on our face." Instead, the company known mainly for its Alberto VO5 hair products has focused its marketing muscle on acquiring a stable of smaller niche brands. Its other items include flavor enhancers Molly McButter and Mrs. Dash, static-cling fighter Static Guard, and Consort men's hairspray. Each of these brands is number one in its niche.18
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Nichers
Nichers: First Commerce Bank of Charlotte, NC, keeps a laser focus on serving the banking needs of small- to mid-size businesses. As for its bigger rivals: "Their crumbs are tasty morsels for us."
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  
   

 

 

Book Home Page
Table of Contents
Chapter Outline
Search Glossary
Chapter Activities
Chapter Exercises
My Course
Progress Tracker
Send Bulletin
Student List
My Highlights
My Profile
Study Guide
Student Resources
Faculty Resources
show highlights
hide highlights
hide quiz highlights
FAQ
Online Support
highlight
note
comment