Principles of Marketing (activebook 2.0 )
 
 
   
 

  
A company has to be good at developing and managing new products. Every product seems to go through a life cycle—it is born, goes through several phases, and eventually dies as newer products come along that better serve consumer needs. This product life cycle presents two major challenges: First, because all products eventually decline, a firm must be good at developing new products to replace aging ones (the problem of new-product development). Second, the firm must be good at adapting its marketing strategies in the face of changing tastes, technologies, and competition as products pass through life-cycle stages (the problem of product life-cycle strategies). We first look at the problem of finding and developing new products and then at the problem of managing them successfully over their life cycles.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

New-Product Development Strategy

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Given the rapid changes in consumer tastes, technology, and competition, companies must develop a steady stream of new products and services. A firm can obtain new products in two ways. One is through acquisition—by buying a whole company, a patent, or a license to produce someone else's product. The other is through new-product development in the company's own research-and-development department. By new products we mean original products, product improvements, product modifications, and new brands that the firm develops through its own research-and-development efforts. In this chapter, we concentrate on new-product development.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Innovation can be very risky. Ford lost $350 million on its Edsel automobile; RCA lost $580 million on its SelectaVision videodisc player; and Texas Instruments lost a staggering $660 million before withdrawing from the home computer business. Even these amounts pale in comparison to the failure of the $5 billion Iridium global satellite-based wireless telephone system. Other costly product failures from sophisticated companies include New Coke (Coca-Cola Company), Eagle Snacks (Anheuser-Busch), Zap Mail electronic mail (FedEx), Polarvision instant movies (Polaroid), Premier "smokeless" cigarettes (R.J. Reynolds), Clorox detergent (Clorox Company), and Arch Deluxe sandwiches (McDonald's).2
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
New products continue to fail at a disturbing rate. One source estimates that new consumer packaged goods (consisting mostly of line extensions) fail at a rate of 80 percent. Another study suggested that of the staggering 25,000 new consumer food, beverage, beauty, and health care products to hit the market each year, only 40 percent will be around five years later. Moreover, failure rates for new industrial products may be as high as 30 percent. Still another estimates new-product failures to be as high as 95 percent.3
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Why do so many new products fail? There are several reasons. Although an idea may be good, the market size may have been overestimated. Perhaps the actual product was not designed as well as it should have been. Or maybe it was incorrectly positioned in the market, priced too high, or advertised poorly. A high-level executive might push a favorite idea despite poor marketing research findings. Sometimes the costs of product development are higher than expected, and sometimes competitors fight back harder than expected.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Because so many new products fail, companies are anxious to learn how to improve their odds of new-product success. One way is to identify successful new products and find out what they have in common. Another is to study new-product failures to see what lessons can be learned. In all, to create successful new products, a company must understand its consumers, markets, and competitors and develop products that deliver superior value to customers.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
So companies face a problem—they must develop new products, but the odds weigh heavily against success. The solution lies in strong new-product planning and in setting up a systematic new-product development process for finding and growing new products. Figure 10.1 shows the eight major steps in this process.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Idea Generation

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
New-product development starts with idea generation—the systematic search for new-product ideas. A company typically has to generate many ideas in order to find a few good ones. According to one well-known management consultant, "For every 1,000 ideas, only 100 will have enough commercial promise to merit a small-scale experiment, only 10 of those will warrant substantial financial commitment, and of those, only a couple will turn out to be unqualified successes." His conclusion? "If you want to find a few ideas with the power to enthrall customers, foil competitors, and thrill investors, you must first generate hundreds and potentially thousands of unconventional strategic ideas."4
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Major sources of new-product ideas include internal sources and external sources such as customers, competitors, distributors and suppliers, and others.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Internal Idea Sources

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Using internal sources, the company can find new ideas through formal research and development. It can pick the brains of its executives, scientists, engineers, manufacturing staff, and salespeople. Some companies have developed successful "intrapreneurial" programs that encourage employees to think up and develop new-product ideas. For example, 3M's well-known "15 percent rule" allows employees to spend 15 percent of their time "bootlegging"—working on projects of personal interest, whether those projects directly benefit the company or not. The spectacularly successful Post-it notes evolved out of this program. Similarly, Texas Instruments's IDEA program provides funds for employees who pursue their own ideas. Among the successful new products to come out of the IDEA program was TI's Speak 'n' Spell, the first children's toy to contain a microchip. Many other speaking toys followed, ultimately generating several hundred million dollars for TI.5
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

External Idea Sources

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Good new-product ideas also come from watching and listening to customers. The company can analyze customer questions and complaints to find new products that better solve consumer problems. Company engineers or salespeople can meet with and work alongside customers to get suggestions and ideas. The company can conduct surveys or focus groups to learn about consumer needs and wants.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Heinz did just that when its researchers approached children, who consume more than half of the ketchup sold, to find out what would make ketchup more appealing to them. "When we asked them what would make the product more fun," says a Heinz spokesperson, "changing the color was among the top responses." So, Heinz developed and launched EZ Squirt, green ketchup that comes in a soft, squeezable bottle targeted at kids. The new product was a smash hit, so Heinz followed up with an entire rainbow of EZ Squirt colors, including Funky Purple, Passion Pink, Awesome Orange, and Totally Teal. The EZ Squirt bottle's special nozzle also emits a thin ketchup stream, "so tykes can autograph their burgers (or squirt someone across the table, though Heinz neglects to mention that)."6
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Consumers often create new products and uses on their own, and companies can benefit by finding these products and putting them on the market. For example, Avon capitalized on new uses discovered by consumers for its Skin-So-Soft bath oil and moisturizer. For years, customers have been spreading the word that Skin-So-Soft bath oil is also a terrific bug repellent. Whereas some consumers were content simply to bathe in water scented with the fragrant oil, others carried it in their backpacks to mosquito-infested campsites or kept a bottle on the deck of their beach houses. Now, Avon offers a complete line of Skin-So-Soft Bug Guard products, including Bug Guard Mosquito Repellant Moisturizing Towelettes and Bug Guard Plus, a combination moisturizer, insect repellent, and sunscreen.7
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Finally, some companies even give customers the tools and resources to design their own products.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Many companies have abandoned their efforts to figure out exactly what products their customers want. Instead, they have equip customers with tools that let them design their own products. The user-friendly tools employ new technologies like computer simulation and rapid prototyping to make product development faster and less expensive. For example, Bush Boake Allen (BBA), a global supplier of specialty flavors to companies like Nestle, provides a tool kit that enables its customers to develop their own flavors, which BBA then manufactures. Similarly, GE Plastics gives customers access to company data sheets, engineering expertise, simulation software, and other Web-based tools for designing better plastics products. Companies like LSI Logic and VLSI Technology provide customers with do-it-yourself tools that let them design their own specialized chips and customized integrated circuits. Using customers as innovators has become a hot new way to create value.8

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Companies must be careful not to rely too heavily on customer input when developing new products. For some products, especially highly technical ones, customers may not know what they need. In such cases, "customers should not be trusted to come up with solutions; they aren't expert or informed enough for that part of the innovation process," says the head of an innovation management consultancy. "That's what your R&D team is for. Rather, customers should be asked only for outcomes—that is, what they want a product or service to do for them."9
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Competitors are another good source of new-product ideas. Companies watch competitors' ads and other communications to get clues about their new products. They buy competing new products, take them apart to see how they work, analyze their sales, and decide whether they should bring out a new product of their own. Distributors and suppliers can also contribute many good new-product ideas. Resellers are close to the market and can pass along information about consumer problems and new-product possibilities. Suppliers can tell the company about new concepts, techniques, and materials that can be used to develop new products. Other idea sources include trade magazines, shows, and seminars; government agencies; new-product consultants; advertising agencies; marketing research firms; university and commercial laboratories; and inventors.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The search for new-product ideas should be systematic rather than haphazard. Otherwise, few new ideas will surface and many good ideas will sputter and die. Top management can avoid these problems by installing an idea management system that directs the flow of new ideas to a central point where they can be collected, reviewed, and evaluated. In setting up such a system, the company can do any or all of the following:10
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
  1. Appoint a respected senior person to be the company's idea manager.

  2. Create a cross-functional idea management committee consisting of people from R&D, engineering, purchasing, operations, finance, and sales and marketing to meet regularly and evaluate proposed new product and service ideas.

  3. Set up a toll-free number or Web site for anyone who wants to send a new idea to the idea manager.

  4. Encourage all company stakeholders—employees, suppliers, distributors, dealers—to send their ideas to the idea manager.

  5. Set up formal recognition programs to reward those who contribute the best new ideas.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The idea manager approach yields two favorable outcomes. First, it helps create an innovation-oriented company culture. It shows that top management supports, encourages, and rewards innovation. Second, it will yield a larger number of ideas, among which will be found some especially good ones. As the system matures, ideas will flow more freely. No longer will good ideas wither for the lack of a sounding board or a senior product advocate.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Idea Screening

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The purpose of idea generation is to create a large number of ideas. The purpose of the succeeding stages is to reduce that number. The first idea-reducing stage is idea screening, which helps spot good ideas and drop poor ones as soon as possible. Product development costs rise greatly in later stages, so the company wants to go ahead only with the product ideas that will turn into profitable products. As one marketing executive suggests, "Three executives sitting in a room can get 40 good ideas ricocheting off the wall in minutes. The challenge is getting a steady stream of good ideas out of the labs and creativity campfires, through marketing and manufacturing, and all the way to consumers."11
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Many companies require their executives to write up new-product ideas on a standard form that can be reviewed by a new-product committee. The write-up describes the product, the target market, and the competition. It makes some rough estimates of market size, product price, development time and costs, manufacturing costs, and rate of return. The committee then evaluates the idea against a set of general criteria. For example, at Kao Company, the large Japanese consumer-products company, the committee asks questions such as these: Is the product truly useful to consumers and society? Is it good for our particular company? Does it mesh well with the company's objectives and strategies? Do we have the people, skills, and resources to make it succeed? Does it deliver more value to customers than do competing products? Is it easy to advertise and distribute? Many companies have well-designed systems for rating and screening new-product ideas.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Concept Development and Testing

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
An attractive idea must be developed into a product concept. It is important to distinguish between a product idea, a product concept, and a product image. A product idea is an idea for a possible product that the company can see itself offering to the market. A product concept is a detailed version of the idea stated in meaningful consumer terms. A product image is the way consumers perceive an actual or potential product.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Concept Development

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
DaimlerChrysler is getting ready to commercialize its experimental fuel-cell-powered electric car. This car's nonpolluting fuel-cell system runs directly on methanol, which delivers hydrogen to the fuel cell with only water as a by-product. It is highly fuel efficient (75 percent more efficient than gasoline engines) and gives the new car an environmental advantage over standard internal combustion engine cars or even today's superefficient gasoline-electric hybrid cars.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
DaimlerChrysler is currently road-testing its NECAR 5 (New Electric Car) subcompact prototype and plans to deliver the first fuel-cell cars to customers in 2004. Based on the tiny Mercedes A-Class, the car accelerates quickly, reaches speeds of 90 miles per hour, and has a 280-mile driving range, giving it a huge edge over battery-powered electric cars that travel only about 80 miles before needing 3 to 12 hours of recharging.12
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
DaimlerChrysler's task is to develop this new product into alternative product concepts, find out how attractive each concept is to customers, and choose the best one. It might create the following product concepts for the fuel-cell electric car:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Concept 1 A moderately priced subcompact designed as a second family car to be used around town. The car is ideal for running errands and visiting friends.
Concept 2 A medium-cost sporty compact appealing to young people.
Concept 3 An inexpensive subcompact “green” car appealing to environmentally conscious people who want practical transportation and low pollution.
Concept 4 A high-end SUV appealing to those who love the space SUVs provide but lament the poor gas mileage.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
figure
DaimlerChrysler's task is to develop its fuel-cell-powered electric car into alternative product concepts, find out how attractive each is to customers, and choose the best one.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Concept Testing

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Concept testing calls for testing new-product concepts with groups of target consumers. The concepts may be presented to consumers symbolically or physically. Here, in words, is concept 3:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
An efficient, fun-to-drive, fuel-cell-powered electric subcompact car that seats four. This methanol-powered high-tech wonder provides practical and reliable transportation with virtually no pollution. It goes up to 90 miles per hour and, unlike battery-powered electric cars, it never needs recharging. It's priced, fully equipped, at $20,000.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
For some concept tests, a word or picture description might be sufficient. However, a more concrete and physical presentation of the concept will increase the reliability of the concept test. Today, some marketers are finding innovative ways to make product concepts more real to consumer subjects. For example, some are using virtual reality to test product concepts. Virtual reality programs use computers and sensory devices (such as gloves or goggles) to simulate reality. A designer of kitchen cabinets can use a virtual reality program to help a customer "see" how his or her kitchen would look and work if remodeled with the company's products. Hairdressers have used virtual reality for years to show consumers how they might look with a new style. Although virtual reality is still in its infancy, its applications are increasing daily.13
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
After being exposed to the concept, consumers then may be asked to react to it by answering questions such as those in Table 10.1. The answers will help the company decide which concept has the strongest appeal. For example, the last question asks about the consumer's intention to buy. Suppose 10 percent of the consumers said they "definitely" would buy and another 5 percent said "probably." The company could project these figures to the full population in this target group to estimate sales volume. Even then, the estimate is uncertain because people do not always carry out their stated intentions.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
 TABLE 10.1 Questions for Fuel-Cell Electric Car Concept Test 
  1. Do you understand the concept of a fuel-cell-powered electric car?

  2. Do you believe the claims about the car’s performance?

  3. What are the major benefits of the fuel-cell-powered electric car compared with a conventional car?

  4. What are its advantages compared with a battery-powered electric car?

  5. What improvements in the car’s features would you suggest?

  6. For what uses would you prefer a fuel-cell-powered electric car to a conventional car?

  7. What would be a reasonable price to charge for the car?

  8. Who would be involved in your decision to buy such a car? Who would drive it?

  9. Would you buy such a car? (definitely, probably, probably not, definitely not)
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Many firms routinely test new-product concepts with consumers before attempting to turn them into actual new products. For example, each month Richard Saunders Inc.'s Acu-Poll research system tests 35 new-product concepts in person on 100 nationally representative grocery store shoppers, rating them as "Pure Gold" or "Fool's Gold" concepts. In past polls, Nabisco's Oreo Chocolate Cones concept received a rare A1 rating, meaning that consumers think it is an outstanding concept that they would try and buy. Glad Ovenware, Reach Whitening Tape dental floss, and Lender's Bake at Home Bagels were also big hits. Other product concepts didn't fare so well. Nubrush Anti-Bacterial Toothbrush Spray disinfectant, from Applied Microdontics, received an F. Consumers found Nubrush to be overpriced, and most don't think they have a problem with "infected" toothbrushes. Nor did consumers think much of Excedrin Tension Headache Cooling Pads or Moist Mates premoistened toilet tissues. Another concept that fared poorly was Chef Williams 5 Minute Marinade, which comes with a syringe customers use to inject the marinade into meats. "I can't see that on grocery shelves," comments an Acu-Poll executive. Some consumers might find the thought of injecting something into meat a bit repulsive, and "it's just so politically incorrect to have this syringe on there."14
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Marketing Strategy Development

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Suppose DaimlerChrysler finds that concept 3 for the fuel-cell-powered electric car tests best. The next step is marketing strategy development, designing an initial marketing strategy for introducing this car to the market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The marketing strategy statement consists of three parts. The first part describes the target market; the planned product positioning; and the sales, market share, and profit goals for the first few years. Thus:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The target market is younger, well-educated, moderate-to-high-income individuals, couples, or small families seeking practical, environmentally responsible transportation. The car will be positioned as more economical to operate, more fun to drive, and less polluting than today's internal combustion engine or hybrid cars, and as less restricting than battery-powered electric cars, which must be recharged regularly. The company will aim to sell 100,000 cars in the first year, at a loss of not more than $15 million. In the second year, the company will aim for sales of 120,000 cars and a profit of $25 million.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The second part of the marketing strategy statement outlines the product's planned price, distribution, and marketing budget for the first year:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The fuel-cell-powered electric car will be offered in three colors—red, white, and blue—and will have optional air-conditioning and power-drive features. It will sell at a retail price of $20,000—with 15 percent off the list price to dealers. Dealers who sell more than 10 cars per month will get an additional discount of 5 percent on each car sold that month. An advertising budget of $30 million will be split 50-50 between national and local advertising. Advertising will emphasize the car's fun spirit and low emissions. During the first year, $100,000 will be spent on marketing research to find out who is buying the car and their satisfaction levels.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The third part of the marketing strategy statement describes the planned long-run sales, profit goals, and marketing mix strategy:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
DaimlerChrysler intends to capture a 3 percent long-run share of the total auto market and realize an after-tax return on investment of 15 percent. To achieve this, product quality will start high and be improved over time. Price will be raised in the second and third years if competition permits. The total advertising budget will be raised each year by about 10 percent. Marketing research will be reduced to $60,000 per year after the first year.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Business Analysis

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Once management has decided on its product concept and marketing strategy, it can evaluate the business attractiveness of the proposal. Business analysis involves a review of the sales, costs, and profit projections for a new product to find out whether they satisfy the company's objectives. If they do, the product can move to the product development stage.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
To estimate sales, the company might look at the sales history of similar products and conduct surveys of market opinion. It can then estimate minimum and maximum sales to assess the range of risk. After preparing the sales forecast, management can estimate the expected costs and profits for the product, including marketing, R&D, operations, accounting, and finance costs. The company then uses the sales and costs figures to analyze the new product's financial attractiveness.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Product Development

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
So far, for many new-product concepts, the product may have existed only as a word description, a drawing, or perhaps a crude mock-up. If the product concept passes the business test, it moves into product development. Here, R&D or engineering develops the product concept into a physical product. The product development step, however, now calls for a large jump in investment. It will show whether the product idea can be turned into a workable product.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The R&D department will develop and test one or more physical versions of the product concept. R&D hopes to design a prototype that will satisfy and excite consumers and that can be produced quickly and at budgeted costs. Developing a successful prototype can take days, weeks, months, or even years. Often, products undergo rigorous tests to make sure that they perform safely and effectively, or that consumers will find value in them. Here are some examples of such product tests:15
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

A scuba-diving Barbie doll must swim and kick for 15 straight hours to satisfy Mattel that she will last at least one year. But because Barbie may find her feet in small owners' mouths rather than in the bathtub, Mattel has devised another, more torturous test: Barbie's feet are clamped by two steel jaws to make sure that her skin doesn't crack—and choke potential owners.

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

At Shaw Industries, temps are paid five dollars an hour to pace up and down five long rows of sample carpets for up to eight hours a day, logging an average of 14 miles each. One regular reads three mysteries a week while pacing and shed 40 pounds in two years. Shaw Industries counts walkers' steps and figures that 20,000 steps equal several years of average carpet wear.

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

P&G spends $150 million on 4,000 to 5,000 studies a year, testing everything from the ergonomics of picking up a shampoo bottle to how long women can keep their hands in sudsy water. On any given day, subjects meet in focus groups, sell their dirty laundry to researchers, put prototype diapers on their babies' bottoms, and rub mysterious creams on their faces. Last year, one elementary school raised $17,000 by having students and parents take part in P&G product tests. Students tested toothpaste and shampoo and ate brownies, while their mothers watched advertising for Tempo tissue, P&G's paper wipes packaged to fit in a car. This year, P&G is paying the school to have 48 students and parents wear new sneakers that they hand in every month for six months. Half the shoes return cleaned. No one knows what P&G is testing, and the company won't say.

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
figure
Product testing: Shaw Industries pays temps to pace up and down on sample carpets. Each average about 14 miles a day. Gillette uses employee-volunteers to test new shaving products—"We bleed so you'll get a good shave at home," says one Gillette employee.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

At Gillette, almost everyone gets involved in new-product testing. Every working day at Gillette, 200 volunteers from various departments come to work unshaven, troop to the second floor of the company's gritty South Boston plant, and enter small booths with a sink and mirror. There they take instructions from technicians on the other side of a small window as to which razor, shaving cream, or aftershave to use. The volunteers evaluate razors for sharpness of blade, smoothness of glide, and ease of handling. In a nearby shower room, women perform the same ritual on their legs, underarms, and what the company delicately refers to as the "bikini area." "We bleed so you'll get a good shave at home," says one Gillette employee.

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The prototype must have the required functional features and also convey the intended psychological characteristics. The fuel-cell electric car, for example, should strike consumers as being well built, comfortable, and safe. Management must learn what makes consumers decide that a car is well built. To some consumers, this means that the car has "solid-sounding" doors. To others, it means that the car is able to withstand heavy impact in crash tests. Consumer tests are conducted in which consumers test-drive the car and rate its attributes.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Test Marketing

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
If the product passes functional and consumer tests, the next step is test marketing, the stage at which the product and marketing program are introduced into more-realistic market settings. Test marketing gives the marketer experience with marketing the product before going to the great expense of full introduction. It lets the company test the product and its entire marketing program—positioning strategy, advertising, distribution, pricing, branding and packaging, and budget levels.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The amount of test marketing needed varies with each new product. Test-marketing costs can be high, and it takes time that may allow competitors to gain advantages. When the costs of developing and introducing the product are low, or when management is already confident about the new product, the company may do little or no test marketing. In fact, test marketing by consumer package-goods firms has been declining in recent years. Companies often do not test-market simple line extensions or copies of successful competitor products. For example, Procter & Gamble introduced its Folger's decaffeinated coffee crystals without test marketing, and Pillsbury rolled out Chewy granola bars and chocolate-covered Granola Dipps with no standard test market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
However, when introducing a new product requires a big investment, or when management is not sure of the product or marketing program, a company may do a lot of test marketing. For instance, Lever USA spent two years testing its highly successful Lever 2000 bar soap in Atlanta before introducing it internationally. Frito-Lay did 18 months of testing in three markets on at least five formulations before introducing its Baked Lays line of low-fat snacks. And both Procter & Gamble and Unilever spent many months testing their new Juvian and MyHome valet laundry and home fabric care services.16
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Although test-marketing costs can be high, they are often small when compared with the costs of making a major mistake. For example, McDonald's made a costly mistake when it introduced its low-fat burger, the McLean Deluxe, nationally without the chain's normal and lengthy testing process. The new product failed after a big investment but lean results. And Nabisco's launch of one new product without testing had disastrous—and soggy—results:
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Nabisco hit a marketing home run with its Teddy Grahams, teddy-bear-shaped graham crackers in several different flavors. So, the company decided to extend Teddy Grahams into a new area. In 1989, it introduced chocolate, cinnamon, and honey versions of Breakfast Bears Graham Cereal. When the product came out, however, consumers didn't like the taste enough, so the product developers went back to the kitchen and modified the formula. But they didn't test it. The result was a disaster. Although the cereal may have tasted better, it no longer stayed crunchy in milk, as the advertising on the box promised. Instead, it left a gooey mess of graham mush on the bottom of cereal bowls. Supermarket managers soon refused to restock the cereal, and Nabisco executives decided it was too late to reformulate the product again. So a promising new product was killed through haste to get it to market.17

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Still, test marketing doesn't guarantee success. For example, Procter & Gamble tested its new Fit produce rinse for heavily for five years and Olay cosmetics for three years. Although market tests suggested the products would be successful, P&G had to pull the plug on both shortly after their introductions.18
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
When using test marketing, consumer products companies usually choose one of three approaches—standard test markets, controlled test markets, or simulated test markets.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Standard Test Markets

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Using standard test markets, the company finds a small number of representative test cities, conducts a full marketing campaign in these cities, and uses store audits, consumer and distributor surveys, and other measures to gauge product performance. The results are used to forecast national sales and profits, discover potential product problems, and fine-tune the marketing program.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Standard test markets have some drawbacks. They can be very costly and they may take a long time—some last as long as three to five years. Moreover, competitors can monitor test-market results or even interfere with them by cutting their prices in test cities, increasing their promotion, or even buying up the product being tested. Finally, test markets give competitors a look at the company's new product well before it is introduced nationally. Thus, competitors may have time to develop defensive strategies, and may even beat the company's product to the market. For example, while Clorox was still test-marketing its new detergent with bleach in selected markets, P&G launched Tide with Bleach nationally. Tide with Bleach quickly became the segment leader; Clorox later withdrew its detergent.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Despite these disadvantages, standard test markets are still the most widely used approach for major in-market testing. However, many companies today are shifting toward quicker and cheaper controlled and simulated test-marketing methods.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Controlled Test Markets

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Several research firms keep controlled panels of stores that have agreed to carry new products for a fee. Controlled test marketing systems like ACNielsen's Scantrack and Information Resources Inc.'s (IRI) BehaviorScan track individual behavior from the television set to the checkout counter.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
In each BehaviorScan market, IRI maintains a panel of shoppers who report all of their purchases by showing an identification card at check-out in participating stores and by using a handheld scanner at home to record purchases at non-participating stores.19 Within test stores, IRI controls such factors as shelf placement, price, and in-store promotions for the product being tested. IRI also measures TV viewing in each panel household and sends special commercials to panel member television sets. Direct mail promotions can also be tested.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Detailed scanner information on each consumer's purchases is fed into a central computer, where it is combined with the consumer's demographic and TV viewing information and reported daily. Thus, BehaviorScan can provide store-by-store, week-by-week reports on the sales of tested products. Such panel purchasing data enables in-depth diagnostics not possible with retail point-of-sale data alone, including repeat purchase analysis, buyer demographics, and earlier, more accurate sales forecasts after just 12 to 24 weeks in market. Most importantly, the system allows companies to evaluate their specific marketing efforts.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Controlled test markets, such as Behaviorscan, usually cost less than standard test markets. Also, because retail distribution is "forced" in the first week of the test, controlled test markets can be completed much more quickly than standard test markets. As in standard test markets, controlled test markets allow competitors to get a look at the company's new product. And some companies are concerned that the limited number of controlled test markets used by the research services may not be representative of their products' markets or target consumers. However, the research firms are experienced in projecting test market results to broader markets and can usually account for biases in the test markets used.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Simulated Test Markets

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Companies can also test new products in a simulated shopping environment. The company or research firm shows ads and promotions for a variety of products, including the new product being tested, to a sample of consumers. It gives consumers a small amount of money and invites them to a real or laboratory store where they may keep the money or use it to buy items. The researchers note how many consumers buy the new product and competing brands.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
This simulation provides a measure of trial and the commercial's effectiveness against competing commercials. The researchers then ask consumers the reasons for their purchase or nonpurchase. Some weeks later, they interview the consumers by phone to determine product attitudes, usage, satisfaction, and repurchase intentions. Using sophisticated computer models, the researchers then project national sales from results of the simulated test market. Recently, some marketers have begun to use interesting new high-tech approaches to simulated-test-market research, such as virtual reality and the Internet.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Simulated test markets overcome some of the disadvantages of standard and controlled test markets. They usually cost much less, can be run in eight weeks, and keep the new product out of competitors' view. Yet, because of their small samples and simulated shopping environments, many marketers do not think that simulated test markets are as accurate or reliable as larger, real-world tests. Still, simulated test markets are used widely, often as "pretest" markets. Because they are fast and inexpensive, they can be run to quickly assess a new product or its marketing program. If the pretest results are strongly positive, the product might be introduced without further testing. If the results are very poor, the product might be dropped or substantially redesigned and retested. If the results are promising but indefinite, the product and marketing program can be tested further in controlled or standard test markets.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Commercialization

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Test marketing gives management the information needed to make a final decision about whether to launch the new product. If the company goes ahead with commercialization—introducing the new product into the market—it will face high costs. The company will have to build or rent a manufacturing facility. And it may have to spend, in the case of a new consumer packaged good, between $10 million and $200 million for advertising, sales promotion, and other marketing efforts in the first year.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The company launching a new product must first decide on introduction timing. If DaimlerChrysler's new fuel-cell electric car will eat into the sales of the company's other cars, its introduction may be delayed. If the car can be improved further, or if the economy is down, the company may wait until the following year to launch it.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Next, the company must decide where to launch the new product—in a single location, a region, the national market, or the international market. Few companies have the confidence, capital, and capacity to launch new products into full national or international distribution. They will develop a planned market rollout over time. In particular, small companies may enter attractive cities or regions one at a time. Larger companies, however, may quickly introduce new models into several regions or into the full national market.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Companies with international distribution systems may introduce new products through global rollouts. Colgate-Palmolive used to follow a "lead-country" strategy. For example, it launched its Palmolive Optims shampoo and conditioner first in Australia, the Philippines, Hong Kong, and Mexico, then rapidly rolled it out into Europe, Asia, Latin America, and Africa. However, most international companies now introduce their new products in swift global assaults. Recently, in its fastest new-product rollout ever, Colgate introduced its Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush into 50 countries in a year, generating $115 million in sales. Such rapid worldwide expansion solidified the brand's market position before foreign competitors could react.20
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  

Organizing for New-Product Development

Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Many companies organize their new-product development process into the orderly sequence of steps shown in Figure 10.1, starting with idea generation and ending with commercialization. Under this sequential product development approach, one company department works individually to complete its stage of the process before passing the new product along to the next department and stage. This orderly, step-by-step process can help bring control to complex and risky projects. But it also can be dangerously slow. In fast-changing, highly competitive markets, such slow-but-sure product development can result in product failures, lost sales and profits, and crumbling market positions. "Speed to market" and reducing new-product development cycle time have become pressing concerns to companies in all industries.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
In order to get their new products to market more quickly, many companies are adopting a faster, team-oriented approach called simultaneous product development (or teamed-based or collaborative product development). Under this approach, company departments work closely together through cross-functional teams, overlapping the steps in the product development process to save time and increase effectiveness. Instead of passing the new product from department to department, the company assembles a team of people from various departments that stays with the new product from start to finish. Such teams usually include people from the marketing, finance, design, manufacturing, and legal departments, and even supplier and customer companies.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Top management gives the product development team general strategic direction but no clear-cut product idea or work plan. It challenges the team with stiff and seemingly contradictory goals—"turn out carefully planned and superior new products, but do it quickly"—and then gives the team whatever freedom and resources it needs to meet the challenge. In the sequential process, a bottleneck at one phase can seriously slow the entire project. In the simultaneous approach, if one functional area hits snags, it works to resolve them while the team moves on.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The Allen-Bradley Company, a maker of industrial controls, realized tremendous benefits by using simultaneous development. Under its old sequential approach, the company's marketing department handed off a new-product idea to designers, who worked in isolation to prepare concepts that they then passed along to product engineers. The engineers, also working by themselves, developed expensive prototypes and handed them off to manufacturing, which tried to find a way to build the new product. Finally, after many years and dozens of costly design compromises and delays, marketing was asked to sell the new product, which it often found to be too high-priced or sadly out of date. Now, all of Allen-Bradley's departments work together to develop new products. The results have been astonishing. For example, the company recently developed a new electrical control in just two years; under the old system, it would have taken six years.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
The simultaneous team-based approach does have some limitations. Superfast product development can be riskier and more costly than the slower, more orderly sequential approach. Moreover, it often creates increased organizational tension and confusion. And the company must take care that rushing a product to market doesn't adversely affect its quality—the objective is not only to create products faster, but to create them better and faster.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Despite these drawbacks, in rapidly changing industries facing increasingly shorter product life cycles, the rewards of fast and flexible product development far exceed the risks. Companies that get new and improved products to the market faster than competitors often gain a dramatic competitive edge. They can respond more quickly to emerging consumer tastes and charge higher prices for more-advanced designs. As one auto industry executive states, "What we want to do is get the new car approved, built, and in the consumer's hands in the shortest time possible. . . . Whoever gets there first gets all the marbles."21
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  

  
Thus, new-product success requires more than simply thinking up a few good ideas, turning them into products, and finding customers for them. It requires a systematic approach for finding new ways to create value for target consumers, from generating and screening new-product ideas to creating and rolling out want-satisfying products to customers. More than this, successful new-product development requires a total-company commitment. At companies known for their new-product prowess—such as 3M, Gillette, and Intel—the entire culture encourages, supports, and rewards innovation.
Comments by Dr. Laukamm

Add/Edit Comments


  
   

 

 

Book Home Page
Table of Contents
Chapter Outline
Search Glossary
Chapter Activities
Chapter Exercises
My Course
Progress Tracker
Send Bulletin
Student List
My Highlights
My Profile
Study Guide
Student Resources
Faculty Resources
show highlights
hide highlights
hide quiz highlights
FAQ
Online Support
highlight
note
comment